Massive Sight

 

Last thoughts on the iPad, and why it failed

As we all know, Apple introduced the "magical" and "revolutionary" device, that just isn't much either of those: the iPad.

Apple took the iPhone and made it bigger. It's actually an bigger iPod Touch, since there's no phone in there. Even they've built that for years, it looks like it has been built in few months. Why? Let me point some things out.

The Home Screen. It's just the same home screen you see in your iPhone. They just made some more space for the icons and put some 3D into the dock, but that's it. That home screen was designed for a small screen, not for a big one, and it shows. Icons just float around. They could've bringed some new features to it, but they chose the easy way: stretch iPhone OS to match that screen size.

No multi-tasking. Some say, Apple will introduce multi-tasking with iPhone OS 4.0. For the iPad's sake, I wish that's true. It would bring iPad closer to a Mac laptop if it had a real Dock or a App switcher. Then again, why they thought it was a good idea to launch a product that "falls into middle" if it really doesn't? It's nowhere near a Mac, it's still an iPod Touch, no matter which way around you look at it.

Mobility. It's small, but in the same time, it's huge. Mainly because it doesn't bring anything new you couldn't do with your iPhone. It's not that much smaller than a MacBook. So why, instead of MacBook (or iPhone), you should take your iPad in the bed with you? You could take it to the toilet, but where you are going to place it while you wipe your behind?

No camera. No video calls with Skype. No nothing. After all, it'd make a crappy camera because of it's size. And if you don't do video calls, do you want to take pictures of your own face everyday? No.

No OS X. You can't go and download Boxee. You can't go and download Things. Or Coda. Or Firefox. Or even iChat. Even though they'd all work pretty ok with the touch screen.

Old apps designed for a smaller screen. Displaying a small app in a huge screen is just plain stupid. Pixel doubling doesn't fix that, it's just a zoom. They should've just skipped that and say with a single line, that it can run old apps.

Gaming. It would be great to run Civilization on the iPad, but... Racing? Did you see the demo, where you had to really stretch your thumbs to make it all the way to those pedals? Borders around that screen are huge. FPS? Nope. Touch controls and gaming doesn't always match. There should be a wireless controller. A wireless gaming console. That would rock.

I can't see myself buying one. Even when I'm always anxious to get my hands on new devices. There's just no room for it in my daily use. I don't need it. On the other hand, I could see my mother using one, but she's quite happy with my old PC.

Someday, the iPad will be great. But the day isn't here yet.

Comments [0]

Facebook Schmeicebook

I don't get what's the fuzz about Facebook privacy settings.

If there's something you don't want everybody in the world to know, you might want to reconsider what you are publishing in the first place.

My mom is in Facebook, that's enough for me.

Comments [0]

Not Apple Tablet

Gruber said that he doesn't think the "tablet" will be called iPad. I agree, but I think it won't be called "Tablet" either. Read it here: http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/01/19/ipad

"Tablet" is just plain too boring. Apple hardly never calls its products what they really are.

MacBook, the laptop, isn't really a book. It may be shaped like a book, but looks like one only viewed from a distance.

iMac... What the hell is "iMac"?

iPod... Pod... Doesn't sound like a music player to me.

iPhone... Ok, my bad.

The only thing is, all those names sounds and looks relatively good when said or typed. "Tablet" sounds like a name that "we came up because we didn't have any better ideas". iSlate is even worse.

After all, I think it won't be named anything mentioned here. It'll be a name that flows. Not "Apple Tablet", just say that out loud to see why. They just might surprise everone by calling it the... iTouch?

Comments [0]

So why the new Google fade-in feature is wasting my time

Today, Google introduced a minor new feature, where logo, search field and buttons are displayed as default, but other elements are hidden - until you move your mouse. Why is this bad? It's simple:

Before I move my mouse, I start looking where the link is I want to click, not the other way around.

So, now every time I want to click a link on the top navigation, I need to move my mouse (read: perform a little mouse gesture) to see what I want to click. No matter that the fade-in is pretty quick, it still wastes my time.

Comments [0]

Mass Import Passwords to Yojimbo

Yojimbo can hold all your passwords, but if you earlier used some other app to store your passwords, and don't want to manually type all those in, this might help you: Mass Import Passwords to Yojimbo

Comments [0]

Yojimbo, The Anything Bucket

I'm constantly searching for apps, that makes my life (and work) easier. 

Few months ago I tried Simplenote, but found out that I don't need a note taking app, since I don't take notes. Then out of curiosity I tried Evernote but didn't like the Mac app's user interface and the way it looks.

Then I found Yojimbo, which can hold notes, bookmarks, entire web archives, images and even passwords and serial numbers. It has the looks I want from a Mac app, but after few days as I fiddled with it, I didn't know if I'd really need it.

I went seeking for some reviews and blog posts just to see what others are thinking about it. Then I came upon Shawn Blanc's post on Yojimbo, and getting to the end of very convincing post, I'm pretty sure I need a app that holds not all, but meaningful data. But after reading the post, I started to wonder if I really need something that I have to prove myself by reading numerous articles...

Nevertheless, if I decide to take out all the files out of my (Finder) folders, those few notes, passwords and all the other stuff, and move it to Yojimbo, I'm little bit concerned what will happen to my use of Dropbox. After all, Dropbox keeps my files synced at all times and at the same time is a nifty way backing those babies up. If Yojimbo could store all the files in folders (and subfolders), and I could change the location where it stores those, I could use Yojimbo and Dropbox simultaneously.

So, I'll give it a go for now, and hope in the near future Bare Bones allows me to drag and drop files out of the app, not just in - export feature is clunky, whatever the app is.

Filed under  //   apps   mac  

Comments [0]

Installing a non-Mac compatible printer

If you own a non-Mac compatible printer (like I do, the HP Color Laserjet 1600) but want to use it on OS X, here's what you can try:

1) Install GhostScript
2) Install Foomatic
3) Install foo2zjs
4) Plugin your printer
5) Go to System Preferences, add your printer

HP Color Laserjet 1600 prints as monochrome by default, so you need to access CUPS to edit default printer settings.

1) Go to http://localhost:631
2) Go to Printers
3) Click on your printer's name
4) Select Set Default Options from the Administration dropdown
5) Change Color Mode to Color
6) Click Set Default Options button to save

And if you are like me, you might have difficulties logging in to CUPS when it asks you to do so, you might have not added yourself as a user. So do this:

1) Open Terminal
2) Enter sudo lppasswd -a yourusername
3) Enter your current password thrice (or any password you like)

If you are still having difficulties printing, check from CUPS admin that you have the correct printer driver selected and change it if needed. For example HP Color Laserjet 1600 works best with HP Color LaserJet 1600 Foomatic/foo2hp driver.

Comments [0]

Worst PC in America, Prize Even More Worse

I think the worst PC in America is still better than the one owner got as a prize in The Worst PC in America contest: http://j.mp/SGffF

Comments [0]

Re-Tweeting With Efficiency, RT Over Via

Some prefer retweeting messages in Twitter with a "RT" in the beginning of a tweet, some use "via" in the end. In several cases, I've noticed that if a tweet starts with a "RT", it's way more faster to figure out that the text isn't originally written by the user who posted it.

Let me explain with two examples. Imagine I posted two tweets on Twitter feed:

New iMacs Feature 21.5 and 27-inch Displays and Available Quad-Core Processors http://j.mp/1xlX8P (via @theappleblog)

RT @theappleblog: New iMacs Feature 21.5 and 27-inch Displays and Available Quad-Core Processors http://j.mp/1xlX8P

First one appears like I wrote it, word by word, but when eye reaches the end, you find out that I didn't. In the second example, there's no question who's text it was originally.

Also when a tweet starts with a RT, I can skip most tweets by just reading first three or four words after finding out it is the same tweet re-tweeted by another user.

What do you think?

Comments [1]

Convert Fonts With Font Forge

Every now and then someone sends me a font file, that needs to be converted to TrueType font file.

Few years ago I found Font Forge. It certainly doesn't look nice, have an intuitive UI or pretty icons, but it does it's job.

Comments [0]